|
Local Content -
Editorial
|
|
Written by production
|
|
Friday, 23 April 2010 16:51 |
|
It seems the one thing you can always count on following an event like last week’s nasty spring blizzard, is the next day the grocery stores and gas stations will be super busy. We are all so very used to being able to go to the grocery store at will that not being able to do so, even for one day, leaves some people in need of the necessities. And it isn’t only regular everyday people who are dependent on our modern ability to bring oranges from Florida, Cilantro from Italy and Rice from Japan to our kitchen tables nearly instantly, but cities are also seemingly complacent about the supplies they have on hand. For example, it has been reported that one super-sized city in the US would run out of the chemicals it needs to clean its water within days if no transports were available to bring in new supplies. Because we can easily store our fruits and vegetables in the fridge or buy them fresh from the grocery store tomorrow, the art of canning has become more of a fun pastime than a necessity. But our fridge’s, like nearly everything else we use, run on electricity. Many residents of Letbhridge got a dose of how it feels to be without power for a few days following last week’s storm. Thankfully it wasn’t accompanied by freezing temperatures. And though we have laptops and cell phones, even these items need to be recharged eventually. What would we do if we, like so many other areas of the world in the last months, were struck by a natural disaster that left us without all these modern conveniences for several weeks? How would we survive if travel was difficult, if not impossible, and we had no power nor any clean water to drink? Perhaps our forefathers, those who survived the Dirty Thirties, used a lot of wisdom in the choices they made within their homes. Most of us had grandma’s who insisted on canning every fall, ensuring their root cellar was lined with jars of everything from jams to string beans, and many with bins of potatoes as well. Those old folks also generally had barrels at each eave of their house, collecting rain water they used for everything from watering gardens to washing hair. Funnily enough, the national news recently reported there is a new idea for Vancouver residents to lower water usage - that’s right, they are being encouraged to use rain barrels (with screens to protect from mosquitos) to collect water. Wow, what a wonderful brand new idea, kind of like recycling (hey grandma, where did you buy the material for those quilts?) or collecting peelings, coffee grounds and eggshells to enrich the soil of next year’s garden. We have been very lucky so far, but one day something could happen that more than inconveniences us for a few hours - it could actually mean relying on what we have on hand to survive for a bit longer than that. Perhaps we should consider preparing for that day now instead of saying ‘I wish I would have....’ when that day is upon us. |
|
|
Local Content -
Editorial
|
|
Written by production
|
|
Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:52 |
|
As Wildrose Alliance party leader, Danielle Smith toured across southeast Alberta last week to express harsh words for the Conservative Party and how she would correct the errors made by Stelmach and company, the Alberta government was making announcements that it would be cutting payments made to welfare recipients. On Friday, the Stelmach government announced a $12.5 million reduction in payments made to welfare recipients who are trying to upgrade their education and get back into the workforce. Once again, it is the weakest and most vulnerable citizens of the province who are getting kicked the hardest. For people who are struggling through tough times and trying to better themselves, to make themselves more marketable, Ed Stelmach's government has decided that the government would rather continue doling out the dole, rather than encouraging betterment of its people and having a more trained workforce as a result. As the Alberta government attempts to reduce its $4.7 billion deficit, Stelmach also announced the cuts would likely not be the last. Expect more to come. Non-profit organizations that serve the mentally ill, such as the Schizophrenia Society, have already been on the receiving end of the cuts when the government previously announced changes to how it would hand out grant dollars. Kick 'em when they're down is a term that resonates repeatedly with this government. For the welfare recipients who are enthusiastic about making a better life for themselves and their families, the announcement surely comes as welcomely as a kick in the teeth. It makes one wonder how a person down and out on his luck is supposed to get back on his feet if his own government turns their back on them. Soup kitchens and food banks across the province are scrounging to meet the demand of their clients, which have increased significantly over the past year and a half. Couple that with a decrease in donations because individuals and businesses are also pinching their pennies and these services are struggling to provide the basic right of all Albertans...the right to eat. Why is he doing this? He said it is to reduce the deficit, but why the most vulnerable? Because they are not able to contribute through taxes back to province. I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine. Recently, the provincial government gave the energy energy a $750-million break on royalties to get the industry back on its feet. Fine. Getting the oil patch workers back on the job is important too. This industry pays back to province handsomely, so Stelmach had no problem reneging on his on previous errors regarding royalties. But, help those who need it most seems to be something Stelmach and his cohorts have no interest in. While Stelmach continues hurting the people of this province, he is providing more fuel than needed for Danielle Smith as she picks up the political torch and runs with it.
|
|
Local Content -
Editorial
|
|
Written by production
|
|
Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:42 |
|
The date Alberta Pharmaceutical Strategy Phase 2 is to be fully implemented, April 1, is fast approaching and although thousands have added their voices cautioning the government on what will happen to rural pharmacies because of this strategy, the policy change still has the green light. The wonderfully worded press releases that have accompanied this planned change have all been positive, reflecting on the fact that Albertans will save money because of APS-2. The detrimental side effects have not been publicly explored. It goes without saying that the money being saved has to be coming out of someone’s pocket, and in this case it comes out of the white lab coat pocket of our local pharmacists. City pharmacies may not feel the pinch right away since most have front-end businesses where the greater part of their profits are made. In fact, in some cases, the pharmacy really isn’t expected to turn a buck - it is just a small component of a much larger store installed to draw customers into the establishment which is likely why it is located way at the back and patrons have to walk through isles of prettily encased sale tagged goods before ever finding the drug store counter. However, rural and independent pharmacies as well as those which specialize in medical equipment will be the first to feel the sting. The question is: Will they survive until a plan emerges which pays pharmacists for all the work they do beyond filling prescriptions, and will that payment schedule be enough to replace what the government is taking away. The way pharmacies make profits currently is obviously imperfect, however it is precipitous to implement cuts without having the way you are going to reimburse those cuts completely figured out. The logic of proceeding on such a pathway is faulty to say the least. So why not stop, take a second look at the strategy, then go ahead when all the components of the plan are in actually in place? Rural Albertan towns have suffered enough. Many factors combine making it more and more difficult for businesses to survive in these areas. Because of the wonderful quality of life offered in these small towns, some business people decide to face all the challenges and establish themselves locally in spite of them. Rural residents cherish these businesses whether they be car dealerships, grocery stores or pharmacies. If the government truly supports rural Alberta, as it says it does, then it needs to show it by carefully considering the impact any strategy it decides to put forward will have on these already beleaguered areas. Albertans can ensure this happens by keeping their objections to strategies like APS-2 on the forefront of the minds of all our representatives - and that means if the April 1 deadline passes and nothing is done to alleviate the problems APS - 2 will cause, then perhaps more letters need to be sent in and more people need to sign those petitions. If that doesn’t work, perhaps people need to show their ire over being ignored by marking their ‘X’ in a different spot during the next election. |
|
Local Content -
Editorial
|
|
Written by production
|
|
Wednesday, 10 March 2010 17:00 |
The peacekeeping mission in Afghanistan keeps costing Canadian soldiers their lives and the nation wonders what will happen to that country when the troops go home, pondering the pros and cons of what it costs to stay and what it means to leave. In Haiti an earthquake has left untold thousands devastated and rebuilding the infrastructure looks like it will be one of the biggest challenges in humanitarianism the world has ever seen. In Chili another earthquake has destroyed hundreds of thousands of homes with a toll of human life in the hundreds. Every day in Canada there seems to be another story of violence ending in horror and death. People still suffer from this ‘economic downturn’, trying to solve monetary problems by earning even more debt. In fact Canadians may have the biggest debt load of any people in the free world. Yet what are our recent headlines focussing on? Changing the shape of hot-dogs and rewording the national anthem? Hmmm... Did we miss something here? It seems studies have shown the shape of the hot-dog is dangerous to kids who tend to choke on them. Okay. We can buy that. So why don’t parents cut them into smaller pieces? Or yell across the playground in the good old-fashioned embarrassment provoking way; “hey, if you keep eating like a hog, you’re going to choke’, similar to other out-of-date phrases like ‘if you keep that up your face is going to freeze that way’ or ‘do you want me to wash your mouth out with soap?’. Where has common sense gone? In speaking to a group of 13-year-olds, some suggested we make the hot-dog into a donut shape - easier to dip into the mustard, maybe. Another suggested a square. Still another suggested the shape stay the same but it just be made way bigger so kids could hit one another with them. Gosh, sounds like the musings of any governmental focus group, doesn’t it? Perhaps the kids who were polled should get paid for their input. Nahhh... Since most of them thought we were having them on and the whole thing was just ridiculous anyway. Wonder why they thought that? As for the national anthem, when did ‘in all thy sons command’ become insulting? Most Canadians spent the last weeks in an Olympic stupor, proudly listening to this anthem as athlete after athlete proved his or her metal and made us all proud. Many Canadians found themselves singing the anthem along while it played, over and over again, on the television. Many felt a shiver tingle their spine and many shared moments of patriotism with their families, all under the Maple Leaf with the anthem playing. And now they want to change it? Why? Because this week we celebrate women and somehow changing the anthem is supposed to honour that celebration. Perhaps easily accessible daycare that is affordable would be a better way to celebrate women. Perhaps ensuring equality in employment opportunities, something which has come a long way yet still has a long way to go, would be a good way to celebrate. Perhaps focussing on women’s health issues would be a likely way to celebrate the day. Or, better yet, perhaps trying to find a way to aid women in Afghanistan, Haiti and Chili would be a better way to spend our time rather than musing on the shape of hot-dogs and a lyric in our anthem.
|
|
Local Content -
Editorial
|
|
Written by production
|
|
Thursday, 04 March 2010 18:09 |
Editorial For the past couple of weeks, many Canadians have been glued to their television, watching the events of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics. To some, the Games are merely a diversion from watching regular TV shows; but for others, the Olympics give one an opportunity to watch sporting events that they would not otherwise be exposed to. To have the Olympics right in your background makes the event all the more significant. From the opening ceremony to the passing of the torch to the next host country, patriotic Canadians watched and supported their athletes. What happened with these Games and the spectators has been almost as spectacular as the games themselves. People who were fortunate enough to be in Vancouver to take in some of the events, were eager to show their enthusiasm not only for the Olympic Games and athletes, but also for their country. Chants of the national anthem broke out at random moments at events and throughout the streets of Vancouver and Whistler. Watching all the spirit from home only heightened the same emotions from those who could not be there. How did all of this sudden patriotism emerge so brilliantly from coast to coast? It may have been the nationwide torch relay that zig-zagged across Canada, including virtually every community and making the whole event a more personal one for viewers. It could be it was just because Canada was fortunate enough to host the Olympics again, an honour this country has had only three times now and likely will not host again for decades to come. Despite a bumpy start, including the tragic death of Georgian luge racer, Nodar Kumaritashvli, glitches during the opening ceremony, and unseasonably warm weather during the first week of competition, the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics can be heralded as a huge success, especially for Canadian athletes who were able to bring in more gold medals than ever before. At 14 gold medals, and a total of 26, it was by far the best medal haul in Canadian winter Olympic history. Watching freestyle skier Alexandre Bilodeau win Canada's first gold medal ever on home turf and then, valiantly embrace his brother was one of many memorable moments during the games. Of course, the mot anticipated event of the entire Winter Games, was the gold medal final in men's hockey. The two powerhouse teams could not have provided better entertainment for hockey fans across the nation. The nailbiter moment when the U.S. scored the tying goal at the end of the third period was enough to suck the breath right out of a die-hard fan. The one thing nobody wanted to see was an overtime period in the game, but that is exactly what happened and it kept viewers on the edge of their seats until Sidney Crosby got the puck past U.S. goalie phenom, Ryan Miller. The arena, the streets and the nation erupted in cheers of pride and celebration. As the Olympic Games drew to a close later Sunday evening, there was a sense of regret that it all had to end so soon. Well, the Games may be over, but the patriotism in this country can carry on like never before. What seemed to be hidden somewhere below the surface, the Olympics gave Canadians the opportunity to express their pride in their country and in some way, it seemed to create a stronger sense of unity amongst us. And, that is one thing that should never be extinguished.
|
|
|